Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | Honour date-format for lot dates | Martin Michlmayr | 2014-05-13 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | Fixes bug #383 | ||||
* | Changed testing format to aid with debugging | John Wiegley | 2011-02-12 | 1 | -6/+6 |
| | |||||
* | Removed needless "=== 0" and ">>>2" lines from test files | John Wiegley | 2011-02-12 | 1 | -3/+0 |
| | |||||
* | Increase display precision of hours to 2 places | John Wiegley | 2010-12-12 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | Price annotation no longer inject an implied cost | John Wiegley | 2010-06-22 | 1 | -7/+5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consider the following transaction: 2010-06-22 Sample Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL {$30} Assets:Brokerage Previously, this would have been equivalent to: 2010-06-22 Sample Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL @ $30 Assets:Brokerage However, this is not always what the user expects to happen. When @ is not being used, the transaction should reflect a mere transfer of commodities. This is now how it works, and thus the above transaction is now equivalent to the following instead: 2010-06-22 Sample Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL {$30} Assets:Brokerage -10 AAPL {$30} | ||||
* | Fixed the way prices and costs are print'd | John Wiegley | 2010-06-07 | 1 | -7/+7 |
| | |||||
* | Added baseline tests for --lot-tags and --lots-actual | John Wiegley | 2009-06-19 | 1 | -0/+27 |