summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/baseline/opt-lots.test
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Price annotation no longer inject an implied costJohn Wiegley2010-06-221-827/+1272
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consider the following transaction: 2010-06-22 Sample Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL {$30} Assets:Brokerage Previously, this would have been equivalent to: 2010-06-22 Sample Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL @ $30 Assets:Brokerage However, this is not always what the user expects to happen. When @ is not being used, the transaction should reflect a mere transfer of commodities. This is now how it works, and thus the above transaction is now equivalent to the following instead: 2010-06-22 Sample Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL {$30} Assets:Brokerage -10 AAPL {$30}
* Removed unused --unsorted optionJohn Wiegley2010-06-151-1/+1
|
* Fixed the way prices and costs are print'dJohn Wiegley2010-06-071-324/+324
|
* Sort by default unless --unsorted is selectedJohn Wiegley2009-10-281-1/+1
|
* Fix to amount unreduction (aka, 120m -> 2h)John Wiegley2009-02-271-498/+497
|
* Added several baseline tests regarding lot detailsJohn Wiegley2009-02-241-0/+5374