summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/baseline/opt-lots_basis.test
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Price annotation no longer inject an implied costJohn Wiegley2010-06-221-11/+17
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consider the following transaction: 2010-06-22 Sample Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL {$30} Assets:Brokerage Previously, this would have been equivalent to: 2010-06-22 Sample Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL @ $30 Assets:Brokerage However, this is not always what the user expects to happen. When @ is not being used, the transaction should reflect a mere transfer of commodities. This is now how it works, and thus the above transaction is now equivalent to the following instead: 2010-06-22 Sample Assets:Brokerage 10 AAPL {$30} Assets:Brokerage -10 AAPL {$30}
* Do not implicitly sort register outputJohn Wiegley2010-03-171-6/+6
| | | | The switches the default back to the same as 2.x, which is --unsorted.
* Sort by default unless --unsorted is selectedJohn Wiegley2009-10-281-6/+6
|
* Fix to amount unreduction (aka, 120m -> 2h)John Wiegley2009-02-271-100/+99
|
* Added several baseline tests regarding lot detailsJohn Wiegley2009-02-241-0/+891