| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Have a single implementation for lexing each of unsigned, signed, and
uninterpreted integers, each generic over the bit width of the integer. This
reduces duplication in the existing code and it will make it much easier to
support lexing more 8- and 16-bit integers.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parse pop expressions and check that they have the expected types, but do not
actually create new Pop expressions or push anything onto the stack because we
already create Pop expressions as necessary when visiting the beginning of catch
blocks.
Unlike the legacy text parser, the new text parser is not capable of parsing
pops in invalid locations in the IR. This means that the new text parser will
never be able to parse test/lit/catch-pop-fixup-eh-old.wast, which deliberately
parses invalid IR to check that the pops can be fixed up and moved to the
correct locations. It should be acceptable to delete that test when we turn on
the new parser by default, though, so that won't be a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use the new `(tuple ...)` syntax. Enforce that tuples have a valid number of
elements and are not nested to avoid assertion failures when parsing invalid
input.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR is part of a series that adds basic support for the [typed continuations proposal](https://github.com/wasmfx/specfx).
This particular PR adds support for the `resume` instruction. The most notable missing feature is validation, which is not implemented, yet.
|
|
|
| |
Parse types like `exnref` and `nofunc` that we did not previously support.
|
|
|
|
| |
The new text parser and IRBuilder were previously not differentiating between
`br` and `br_if`. Handle `br_if` correctly by popping and assigning a condition.
|
|
|
|
| |
The planned spec change to use "sub open" never came together, so the standard
format remains "sub final".
|
|
|
|
| |
And validate in IRBuilder both that the input annotation is valid and that the
input matches it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To parse folded instructions in the right order, we need to defer parsing each
instruction until we have parsed each of its children and found its closing
parenthesis. Previously we naively looked for parentheses to determine where
instructions began and ended before we parsed them, but that scheme did not
correctly handle instructions that can contain parentheses in their immediates,
such as call_indirect.
Fix the problem by using the actual instruction parser functions with a
placeholder context to find the end of the instructions, including any kind of
immediates they might have.
|
|
|
|
| |
We previously support the in-line import abbreviation, but now add support for
explicit, non-abbreviated imports as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds basic support for the new instructions in the new EH proposal
passed at the Oct CG hybrid CG meeting:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/main/main/2023/CG-10.md
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/blob/main/proposals/exception-handling/Exceptions.md
This mainly adds two instructions: `try_table` and `throw_ref`. This is
the bare minimum required to read and write text and binary format, and
does not include analyses or optimizations. (It includes some analysis
required for validation of existing instructions.) Validation for
the new instructions is not yet included.
`try_table` faces the same problem with the `resume` instruction in
#6083 that without the module-level tag info, we are unable to know the
'sent types' of `try_table`. This solves it with a similar approach
taken in #6083: this adds `Module*` parameter to `finalize` methods,
which defaults to `nullptr` when not given. The `Module*` parameter is
given when called from the binary and text parser, and we cache those
tag types in `sentTypes` array within `TryTable` class. In later
optimization passes, as long as they don't touch tags, it is fine to
call `finalize` without the `Module*`. Refer to
https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/pull/6083#issuecomment-1854634679
and #6096 for related discussions when `resume` was added.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parse `tuple.make`, `tuple.extract`, and `tuple.drop`. Also slightly improve the
way we break up tuples into individual elements in IRBuilder by using a
`local.tee` instead of a block containing a `local.set` and `local.get`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parse `array.new_elem`, `array.init_data`, and `array.init_elem`.
Accidentally also includes:
* [Parser] Parse string types and operations (#6161)
|
|
|
|
| |
Like `delegate`, rethrow takes a `Try` label. Refactor the delegate handling so
that `Try` can share its logic.
|
|
|
|
| |
Including table.get, table.set, table.size, table.grow, table.fill, and
table.copy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We previously overloaded `drop` to mean both normal drops of single values and
also drops of tuple values. That works fine in the legacy text parser since it
can infer parent-child relationships directly from the s-expression structure of
the input, so it knows that a drop should drop an entire tuple if the
tuple-producing instruction is a child of the drop. The new text parser,
however, is much more like the binary parser in that it uses instruction types
to create parent-child instructions. The new parser always assumes that `drop`
is meant to drop just a single value because that's what it does in WebAssembly.
Since we want to continue to let `Drop` IR expressions consume tuples, and since
we will need a way to write tests for that IR pattern that work with the new
parser, introduce a new pseudoinstruction, `tuple.drop`, to represent drops of
tuples. This pseudoinstruction only exists in the text format and it parses to
normal `Drop` expressions. `tuple.drop` takes the arity of its operand as an
immediate, which will let the new parser parse it correctly in the future.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These module fields are especially complex to parse because they contain both
nontrivial types and instructions, so their parsing logic needs to be spread out
across the ParseDecls, ParseModuleTypes, and ParseDefs phases of parsing. This
applies to in-line elements in table definitions as well, which means we need to
be able to match a table to its in-line element segment across multiple phases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parse the legacy v3 syntax for try/catch/catch_all/delegate in both its folded
and unfolded forms.
The first sources of significant complexity is the optional IDs after `catch`
and `catch_all` in the unfolded form, which can be confused for tag indices and
require backtracking to parse correctly.
The second source of complexity is the handling of delegate labels, which are
relative to the try's parent scope despite being parsed after the try's scope
has already started. Handling this correctly requires punching a whole big
enough to drive a truck through through both the parser and IRBuilder
abstractions.
|
|
|
|
| |
Also fix the parser to correctly error if an imported item appears after a
non-imported item and make the corresponding fix to the test.
|
|
|
|
| |
Also mark array.new_elem as unimplemented as a drive-by; it previously had an
incorrect implementation.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new wat parser parses block, if, loop, then, and else keywords directly
rather than depending on code generated from gen-s-parser.py. Filter these
keywords out in gen-s-parser.py when generating the new wat parser and delete
the stub functions that the removed generated code used to depend on.
|
|
|
|
| |
To support parsing calls, add support for parsing function indices and building
calls with IRBuilder.
|
|
|
| |
Helps #5951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR is part of a series that adds basic support for the [typed continuations proposal](https://github.com/wasmfx/specfx).
This PR adds continuation types, of the form `(cont $foo)` for some function type `$foo`.
The only notable changes affecting existing code are the following:
- This is the first `HeapType` which has another `HeapType` (rather than, say, a `Type`) as its immediate child. This required fixes to certain traversals that have a flag for being at the toplevel of a type.
- Some shared logic for parsing `HeapType`s has been factored out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The parser previously parsed labels and could attach them to control flow
structures, but did not maintain the context necessary to correctly parse
branches. Support parsing labels as both names and indices in IRBuilder,
handling shadowing correctly, and use that support to implement parsing of br.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a `visitFunctionStart` function to IRBuilder and make it responsible for
setting the function's body when the context is closed. This will simplify
outlining, will be necessary to support branches to function scope properly, and
removes an extra block around function bodies in the new wat parser.
|
|
|
| |
Parse loops in the new wat parser and add support for them to the IRBuilder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Somewhat counterintuitively, the text syntax for a folded `if` allows any number
of folded instructions in the condition position, not just one. Update the
corresponding `foldedinsts` parsing function to parse arbitrary sequences of
folded instructions and add a test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new wat parser previously returned InstrT types when parsing individual
instructions and collected InstrsT types when parsing sequences of instructions.
However, instructions were always actually tracked in the internal state of the
parsing context, so these types never held any interesting or necessary data.
Simplify the parser by removing these types and leaning into the pattern that
the parser context will keep track of parsed instructions.
This allows for a much cleaner separation between the `instrs` and
`foldedinstrs` parser functions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Parse both the straight-line and folded versions of if, including the
abbreviations that allow omitting the else clause. In the IRBuilder, generalize
the scope stack to be able to track scopes other than blocks and add methods for
visiting the beginnings of ifs and elses.
|
|
And put the new files in a new source directory, "parser". This is a rough split
and is not yet expected to dramatically improve compile times. The exact
organization of the new files is subject to change, but this splitting should be
enough to make further parser development more pleasant.
|