| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
| |
See discussion in #3303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
X - Y <= 0
=>
X <= Y
That is true mathematically, but not in the case of an overflow, e.g.
X=10, Y=0x8000000000000000. X - Y is a negative number, so
X - Y <= 0 is true. But it is not true that X <= Y (as Y is negative, but
X is not).
See discussion in #3303 (comment)
The actual regression was in #3275, but the fuzzer had an easier time
finding it due to #3303
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bool(i32(x) % C_pot) -> bool(i32(x) & (C_pot - 1))
bool(i32(x) % min_s) -> bool(i32(x) & max_s)
For all other situations we already do this for (i32|i64).rem_s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using addition in more places is better for gzip, and helps simplify the
optimizer as well.
Add a FinalOptimizer phase to do optimizations like our signed LEB tweaks, to
reduce binary size in the rare case when we do want a subtraction.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Move the checks for most unoptimizable expression types out into visitExpression and simplify some other code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can still make x * -1.0 cheaper for non-fastMath mode as:
x * -1.0 -> -0.0 - x
Should at least help baseline compilers.
Also it could enable further optimizations, e.g.:
a + b * -1
a + (-0.0 - b)
(a - 0.0) - b
a - b
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`C1 - (x + C2)` -> `(C1 - C2) - x`
`C1 - (x - C2)` -> `(C1 + C2) - x`
`C1 - (C2 - x)` -> `x + (C1 - C2)`
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes a fuzz bug that was triggered by
https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/pull/3015#issuecomment-718001620
but was actually a pre-existing bug in pow2, that that PR just happened
to uncover.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
But only when doing so doesn't require adding a new local.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This change makes matchers in OptimizeInstructions more compact and readable by
removing the explicit `Abstract::` namespace from individual operations. In some
cases, this makes multi-line matcher expressions fit on a single line.
This change is only possible because it also adds an explicit "RMW" prefix to
each element of the `AtomicRMWOp` enumeration. Without that, their names
conflicted with the names of Abstract ops.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Extend ZeroRemover and optimizeAddedConstants to handle 64-bit integers as well.
Use Literal.makeFromInt64 to make this easier.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
i32(bool(x)) != 0 ==> i32(bool(x))
i64(bool(x)) & 1 ==> i64(bool(x))
Also:
* clean up related matching rules in optimizeWithConstantOnRight
* add more explanations about isPowerOf2Float & rename to
isPowerOfTwoInvertibleFloat
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`(uint32_t)x / C` --> `x >= C`, where `C > 2^31`
`(uint32_t)x / -1` --> `x != -1`
and for `shrinkLevel == 0`:
`(uint64_t)x / C` --> `uint64_t(x >= C)`, where `C > 2^63`
`(uint64_t)x / -1` --> `x != -1`
|
|
|
| |
When there are two versions of a function, one handling tuples and the other handling non-tuple values, the previous naming convention was to have "Single" in the name of the non-tuple handling function. This PR simplifies the convention and shortens function names by making the names plural for the tuple-handling version and singular for the non-tuple-handling version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Wasm turned out to not be that good for a DSL for such peephole optimizations,
so that never made progress. Meanwhile we have the new matcher stuff which
works well.
|
|
|
| |
Specifically, truncates constant shift values that are greater than the number of bits available and optimizes out explicit masking of the shift value that is redundant with the implicit masking performed by shift operations.
|
|
|
| |
`(signed)x % (i32|i64).min_s ==> (x & (i32|i64).max_s)` is not valid unless compared to zero.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Implement a more general (additional) version of #3153 which also handles negative constant divisors:
`(int32)x % -4 == 0` --> `(x & 3) == 0`
`x % -C_pot == 0` --> `(x & (abs(C_pot) - 1)) == 0`
and special two-complement values as well:
`(int32)x % 0x80000000 == 0` --> `(x & 0x7fffffff) == 0`
`(int64)x % 0x8000000000000000 == 0` --> `(x & 0x7fffffffffffffff) == 0`
as separete rules:
`(int32)x % 0x80000000` --> `x & 0x7fffffff`
`(int64)x % 0x8000000000000000` --> `x & 0x7fffffffffffffff`
The [previous pr](https://github.com/WebAssembly/binaryen/pull/3153) didn't use these possibilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(found by the fuzzer)
It is not valid to replace x | (y | x) ==> y | x, if x, y cannot be reordered.
It is also not valid to replace x ^ (y ^ x) ==> y, if x, y cannot be reordered,
for a more subtle reason: if they cannot be reordered then y can affect the
value of x (the opposite is not possible as we checked x for side effects so
that we could remove one copy). If so, then the second appearance of x
could be different, if e.g. it reads a local y writes to. Whereas, if it's ok to
reorder, then it's ok to do x ^ (y ^ x) ==> x ^ (x ^ y) ==> y.
|
|
|
|
| |
mask (#3184)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use overloads instead of templates where applicable and change function names
from PascalCase to camelCase. Also puts the functions in the Bits namespace to
avoid naming conflicts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Similar to clang and gcc, --fast-math makes us ignore corner cases of floating-point
math like NaN changes and (not done yet) lack of associativity and so forth.
In the future we may want to have separate fast math flags for each specific thing,
like gcc and clang do.
This undoes some changes (#2958 and #3096) where we assumed it was
ok to not change NaN bits, but @binji corrected us. We can only do such things in fast
math mode. This puts those optimizations behind that flag, adds tests for it, and
restores the interpreter to the simpler code from before with no special cases.
|
|
|
| |
Specifically, when `x` has at most 32 bits so that wrapping doesn't change its value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Specifically when the divisor is a power of two.
`eqz((signed)x % C_pot)` -> `eqz(x & (C_pot - 1))`
`(signed)x % C_pot != 0` -> `x & (C_pot - 1) != 0`
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This can unlock further instruction optimizations that do not apply to signed operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Provides an easily extensible layered API for matching expression patterns and
extracting their components. The low-level API provides modular building blocks
for creating matchers for any data type and the high-level API provides a
succinct and flexible interface for matching expressions and extracting useful
information from them.
Matchers are currently provided for Const, Unary, Binary, and Select
instructions. Adding a matcher for a new type of expression is straightforward
enough that I expect to add them as they become useful as part of other changes.
|
|
|
| |
Also includes a lot of new spec tests that eventually need to go into the spec repo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`expr | 1` --> `1`
`expr & 1` --> `expr`
`expr == 1` --> `expr`
`expr != 1` --> `!expr`
where `maxBits(expr) == 1` i.e `expr` is boolean
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Simplifies patterns in which an expression is applied twice to its operands.
`abs(abs(x))` -> `abs(x)`
`ceil(ceil(x))` -> `ceil(x)`
`floor(floor(x))` -> `floor(x)`
`trunc(trunc(x))` -> `trunc(x)`
`nearest(nearest(x))` -> `nearest(x)`
`eqz(eqz(bool(x)))` -> `bool(x)`
`sext(sext(x))` -> `sext(x)`
`neg(neg(x))` -> `x`
`y - (y - x)` -> `x`
`(x ^ y) ^ y` -> `x`
`(x | y) | y` -> `x | y`
`(x & y) & y` -> `x & y`
`(x % y) % y` -> `x % y`
|
|
|
| |
Add floating point Eq and Ne operators to Properties::isSymmetric. Also treat additional float ops as symmetric specifically in OptimizeInstructions when their operands are known to be non-NaN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
`x - 0.0` -> `x`
`x + (-0.0)` -> `x`
`x - (-0.0)` -> `x + 0.0`
where `x` is `f32` or `f64`.
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a bug in which a side effect in the calculation of the size could be lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to changes in spec:
WebAssembly/bulk-memory-operations#124
WebAssembly/bulk-memory-operations#145
we unfortunately can't fold to nop even for memory.copy(x, y, 0).
So this PR revert all reductions to nop but do this only under ignoreImplicitTraps flag
|
|
|
|
|
| |
That can trap, so we can only remove it if traps are ignored,
which was not handled properly. Revert it as we consider the
options.
|
|
|
| |
Fix issue found by fuzzer: #3038 (comment)
|
|
|
| |
Replace it with a load and a store when the size is a small constant and remove it entirely when it would be a nop.
|