| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the first stage of adding support for stacky/multivaluey things. It adds new push/pop instructions, and so far just shows that they can be read and written, and that the optimizer doesn't do anything immediately wrong on them.
No fuzzer support, since there isn't a "correct" way to use these yet. The current test shows some "incorrect" usages of them, which is nice to see that we can parse/emit them, but we should replace them with proper usages of push/pop once we actually have those (see comments in the tests).
This should be enough to unblock exceptions (which needs a pop in try-catches). It is also a step towards multivalue (I added some docs about that), but most of multivalue is left to be done.
|
|
|
This adds a new IR, "Stack IR". This represents wasm at a very low level, as a simple stream of instructions, basically the same as wasm's binary format. This is unlike Binaryen IR which is structured and in a tree format.
This gives some small wins on binary sizes, less than 1% in most cases, usually 0.25-0.50% or so. That's not much by itself, but looking forward this prepares us for multi-value, which we really need an IR like this to be able to optimize well. Also, it's possible there is more we can do already - currently there are just a few stack IR optimizations implemented,
DCE
local2stack - check if a set_local/get_local pair can be removed, which keeps the set's value on the stack, which if the stars align it can be popped instead of the get.
Block removal - remove any blocks with no branches, as they are valid in wasm binary format.
Implementation-wise, the IR is defined in wasm-stack.h. A new StackInst is defined, representing a single instruction. Most are simple reflections of Binaryen IR (an add, a load, etc.), and just pointers to them. Control flow constructs are expanded into multiple instructions, like a block turns into a block begin and end, and we may also emit extra unreachables to handle the fact Binaryen IR has unreachable blocks/ifs/loops but wasm does not. Overall, all the Binaryen IR differences with wasm vanish on the way to stack IR.
Where this IR lives: Each Function now has a unique_ptr to stack IR, that is, a function may have stack IR alongside the main IR. If the stack IR is present, we write it out during binary writing; if not, we do the same binaryen IR => wasm binary process as before (this PR should not affect speed there). This design lets us use normal Passes on stack IR, in particular this PR defines 3 passes:
Generate stack IR
Optimize stack IR (might be worth splitting out into separate passes eventually)
Print stack IR for debugging purposes
Having these as normal passes is convenient as then they can run in parallel across functions and all the other conveniences of our current Pass system. However, a downside of keeping the second IR as an option on Functions, and using normal Passes to operate on it, means that we may get out of sync: if you generate stack IR, then modify binaryen IR, then the stack IR may no longer be valid (for example, maybe you removed locals or modified instructions in place etc.). To avoid that, Passes now define if they modify Binaryen IR or not; if they do, we throw away the stack IR.
Miscellaneous notes:
Just writing Stack IR, then writing to binary - no optimizations - is 20% slower than going directly to binary, which is one reason why we still support direct writing. This does lead to some "fun" C++ template code to make that convenient: there is a single StackWriter class, templated over the "mode", which is either Binaryen2Binary (direct writing), Binaryen2Stack, or Stack2Binary. This avoids a lot of boilerplate as the 3 modes share a lot of code in overlapping ways.
Stack IR does not support source maps / debug info. We just don't use that IR if debug info is present.
A tiny text format comment (if emitting non-minified text) indicates stack IR is present, if it is ((; has Stack IR ;)). This may help with debugging, just in case people forget. There is also a pass to print out the stack IR for debug purposes, as mentioned above.
The sieve binaryen.js test was actually not validating all along - these new opts broke it in a more noticeable manner. Fixed.
Added extra checks in pass-debug mode, to verify that if stack IR should have been thrown out, it was. This should help avoid any confusion with the IR being invalid.
Added a comment about the possible future of stack IR as the main IR, depending on optimization results, following some discussion earlier today.
|
