From e20f04215a264939f74306fa7a29deb97bad3f1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Monnier Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:17:22 -0400 Subject: * lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.el (macroexpand-all-1): Put back special handling for `lambda' (misunderstanding). --- lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.el | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.el') diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.el index aabf940964b..876b9a468ac 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/macroexp.el @@ -145,6 +145,11 @@ Assumes the caller has bound `macroexpand-all-environment'." form)) ((eq fun 'quote) form) + ((and (consp fun) (eq (car fun) 'lambda)) + ;; Embedded lambda in function position. + (maybe-cons (macroexpand-all-forms fun 2) + (macroexpand-all-forms (cdr form)) + form)) ;; The following few cases are for normal function calls that ;; are known to funcall one of their arguments. The byte ;; compiler has traditionally handled these functions specially -- cgit v1.2.3