From 1814c7e158685045278f991de5eba4e40e8c8199 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mattias Engdegård Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:49:26 +0100 Subject: Fix rx error with ? and ?? The ? and ?? rx operators are special in that they can be written as characters (space and '?' respectively). This confused the definition look-up mechanism in rare cases. * lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el (rx--expand-def): Don't look up non-symbols. * test/lisp/emacs-lisp/rx-tests.el (rx-charset-or): Test. --- lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'lisp/emacs-lisp') diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el index d4a91710273..aa4b2addd47 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/rx.el @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Each entry is: (if (cdr def) (error "Not an `rx' symbol definition: %s" form) (car def))))) - ((consp form) + ((and (consp form) (symbolp (car form))) (let* ((op (car form)) (def (rx--lookup-def op))) (and def -- cgit v1.2.3