From 519c7ca7356fc7f9707b97c143c9495deea5b272 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mattias Engdegård Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 15:54:32 +0100 Subject: Don't pretend that hash-table-size is useful * lisp/emacs-lisp/shortdoc.el (hash-table): Remove hash-table-size entry. * doc/lispref/hash.texi (Other Hash): * src/fns.c (Fhash_table_size): Make it clear that hash-table-size is probably not worth using. --- lisp/emacs-lisp/shortdoc.el | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'lisp/emacs-lisp') diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/shortdoc.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/shortdoc.el index 17cbf6b2d31..a6a49c72f74 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/shortdoc.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/shortdoc.el @@ -572,10 +572,7 @@ A FUNC form can have any number of `:no-eval' (or `:no-value'), :result-string "#s(hash-table ...)") (hash-table-count :no-eval (hash-table-count table) - :eg-result 15) - (hash-table-size - :no-eval (hash-table-size table) - :eg-result 65)) + :eg-result 15)) (define-short-documentation-group list "Making Lists" -- cgit v1.2.3