From 86960383cf8bd709e08aac483a7f60be2f8c2dcf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Glenn Morris Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:12:51 -0400 Subject: * lisp/htmlfontify.el (hfy-begin-span-handler): Doc fix. --- lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'lisp/emacs-lisp') diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el index c179ffcafd6..d1119e10903 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el @@ -4173,7 +4173,7 @@ Return a list of the form ((TEST . VAR) ((VALUE BODY) ...))" ;; to be non-nil for generating tags for all cases. Since ;; `byte-compile-depth' will increase by at most 1 after compiling ;; all of the clause (which is further enforced by cl-assert below) - ;; it should be safe to preserve it's value. + ;; it should be safe to preserve its value. (let ((byte-compile-depth byte-compile-depth)) (byte-compile-goto 'byte-goto default-tag)) @@ -4191,7 +4191,7 @@ Return a list of the form ((TEST . VAR) ((VALUE BODY) ...))" (let ((byte-compile-depth byte-compile-depth) (init-depth byte-compile-depth)) ;; Since `byte-compile-body' might increase `byte-compile-depth' - ;; by 1, not preserving it's value will cause it to potentially + ;; by 1, not preserving its value will cause it to potentially ;; increase by one for every clause body compiled, causing ;; depth/tag conflicts or violating asserts down the road. ;; To make sure `byte-compile-body' itself doesn't violate this, -- cgit v1.2.3