| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously we had passes --generate-stack-ir, --optimize-stack-ir, --print-stack-ir
that could be run like any other passes. After generating StackIR it was stashed on
the function and invalidated if we modified BinaryenIR. If it wasn't invalidated then
it was used during binary writing. This PR switches things so that we optionally
generate, optimize, and print StackIR only during binary writing. It also removes
all traces of StackIR from wasm.h - after this, StackIR is a feature of binary writing
(and printing) logic only.
This is almost NFC, but there are some minor noticeable differences:
1. We no longer print has StackIR in the text format when we see it is there. It
will not be there during normal printing, as it is only present during binary writing.
(but --print-stack-ir still works as before; as mentioned above it runs during writing).
2. --generate/optimize/print-stack-ir change from being passes to being flags that
control that behavior instead. As passes, their order on the commandline mattered,
while now it does not, and they only "globally" affect things during writing.
3. The C API changes slightly, as there is no need to pass it an option "optimize" to
the StackIR APIs. Whether we optimize is handled by --optimize-stack-ir which is
set like other optimization flags on the PassOptions object, so we don't need the
old option to those C APIs.
The main benefit here is simplifying the code, so we don't need to think about
StackIR in more places than just binary writing. That may also allow future
improvements to our usage of StackIR.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The new text parser is faster and more standards compliant than the old text
parser. Enable it by default in wasm-opt and update the tests to reflect the
slightly different results it produces. Besides following the spec, the new
parser differs from the old parser in that it:
- Does not synthesize `loop` and `try` labels unnecessarily
- Synthesizes different block names in some cases
- Parses exports in a different order
- Parses `nop`s instead of empty blocks for empty control flow arms
- Does not support parsing Poppy IR
- Produces different error messages
- Cannot parse `pop` except as the first instruction inside a `catch`
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We previously supported (and primarily used) a non-standard text format for
conditionals in which the condition, if-true expression, and if-false expression
were all simply s-expression children of the `if` expression. The standard text
format, however, requires the use of `then` and `else` forms to introduce the
if-true and if-false arms of the conditional. Update the legacy text parser to
require the standard format and update all tests to match. Update the printer to
print the standard format as well.
The .wast and .wat test inputs were mechanically updated with this script:
https://gist.github.com/tlively/85ae7f01f92f772241ec994c840ccbb1
|
| |
|
| |
That optimization uncovered some LLVM and Binaryen bugs.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we export a function that just calls another function, we can export that one
instead. Then the one in the middle may be unused,
function foo() {
return bar();
}
export foo; // can be an export of bar
This saves a few bytes in rare cases, but probably more important is that it saves
the trampoline, so if this is on a hot path, we save a call.
Context: emscripten-core/emscripten#20478 (comment)
In general this is not needed as inlining helps us out by inlining foo() into the
caller (since foo is tiny, that always ends up happening). But exports are a case
the inliner cannot handle, so we do it here.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This PR removes the single memory restriction in IR, adding support for a single module to reference multiple memories. To support this change, a new memory name field was added to 13 memory instructions in order to identify the memory for the instruction.
It is a goal of this PR to maintain backwards compatibility with existing text and binary wasm modules, so memory indexes remain optional for memory instructions. Similarly, the JS API makes assumptions about which memory is intended when only one memory is present in the module. Another goal of this PR is that existing tests behavior be unaffected. That said, tests must now explicitly define a memory before invoking memory instructions or exporting a memory, and memory names are now printed for each memory instruction in the text format.
There remain quite a few places where a hardcoded reference to the first memory persist (memory flattening, for example, will return early if more than one memory is present in the module). Many of these call-sites, particularly within passes, will require us to rethink how the optimization works in a multi-memories world. Other call-sites may necessitate more invasive code restructuring to fully convert away from relying on a globally available, single memory pointer.
|
| |
|
| |
I was reading these tests and failing to find the names script.
|
| |
|
