| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We normally like to move brs after ifs into the if, when in a loop:
(loop $loop
(if
..
(unreachable)
(code)
)
(br $loop)
)
=>
(loop $loop
(if
..
(unreachable)
(block
(code)
(br $loop) ;; moved in
)
)
)
However this may be invalid to do if the if condition is unreachable, as
then one arm may be concrete (`code` in the example could be an `i32`,
for example). As this is dead code anyhow, leave it for DCE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
RemoveUnusedBrs sinks blocks into If arms when those arms contain
branches to the blocks and the other arm and condition do not. Now that
we type Ifs with unreachable conditions as unreachable, it is possible
for the If arms to have a different type than the block that would be
sunk, so sinking the block would produce invalid IR. Fix the problem by
never sinking blocks into Ifs with unreachable conditions.
Fixes #7128.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When IRBuilder builds an empty non-block scope such as a function body,
an if arm, a try block, etc, it needs to produce some expression to
represent the empty contents. Previously it produced a nop, but change
it to produce an empty block instead. The binary writer and printer have
special logic to elide empty blocks, so this produces smaller output.
Update J2CLOpts to recognize functions containing empty blocks as
trivial to avoid regressing one of its tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We previously supported (and primarily used) a non-standard text format for
conditionals in which the condition, if-true expression, and if-false expression
were all simply s-expression children of the `if` expression. The standard text
format, however, requires the use of `then` and `else` forms to introduce the
if-true and if-false arms of the conditional. Update the legacy text parser to
require the standard format and update all tests to match. Update the printer to
print the standard format as well.
The .wast and .wat test inputs were mechanically updated with this script:
https://gist.github.com/tlively/85ae7f01f92f772241ec994c840ccbb1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We previously overloaded `drop` to mean both normal drops of single values and
also drops of tuple values. That works fine in the legacy text parser since it
can infer parent-child relationships directly from the s-expression structure of
the input, so it knows that a drop should drop an entire tuple if the
tuple-producing instruction is a child of the drop. The new text parser,
however, is much more like the binary parser in that it uses instruction types
to create parent-child instructions. The new parser always assumes that `drop`
is meant to drop just a single value because that's what it does in WebAssembly.
Since we want to continue to let `Drop` IR expressions consume tuples, and since
we will need a way to write tests for that IR pattern that work with the new
parser, introduce a new pseudoinstruction, `tuple.drop`, to represent drops of
tuples. This pseudoinstruction only exists in the text format and it parses to
normal `Drop` expressions. `tuple.drop` takes the arity of its operand as an
immediate, which will let the new parser parse it correctly in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously, the number of tuple elements was inferred from the number of
s-expression children of the `tuple.make` expression, but that scheme would not
work in the new wat parser, where s-expressions are optional and cannot be
semantically meaningful.
Update the text format to take the number of tuple elements (i.e. the tuple
arity) as an immediate. This new format will be able to be implemented in the
new parser as follow-on work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Type annotations on multivalue blocks (and loops, ifs, and trys) are type
indices that refer to function types in the type section. For these type
annotations, the identities of the function types does not matter. As long as
the referenced type has the correct parameters and results, it will be valid to
use.
Previously, when collecting module types, we always used the "default" function
type for multivalue control flow, i.e. we used a final function type with no
supertypes in a singleton rec group. However, in cases where the program already
contains another function type with the expected signature, using the default
type is unnecessary and bloats the type section.
Update the type collecting code to reuse existing function types for multivalue
control flow where possible rather than unconditionally adding the default
function type. Similarly, update the binary writer to use the first heap type
with the required signature when emitting annotations on multivalue control flow
structures. To make this all testable, update the printer to print the type
annotations as well, rather than just the result types. Since the parser was not
able to parse those newly emitted type annotations, update the parser as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#5989)
Fixes #5983: The testcase from there is used here in a new testcase
remove-unused-brs_levels in which we check if we are willing to unconditionally
do a division operation. Turning an if with an arm that does a division into a
select, which always does the division, is almost 5x slower, so we should probably
be extremely careful about doing that.
I took some measurements and have some suggestions for changes in this PR:
* Raise the cost of div/rem to what I measure on my machine, which is 5x slower
than an add, or worse.
* For some reason we added the if arms rather than take the max of them, so
fix that. This does not help the issue, but was confusing.
* Adjust TooCostlyToRunUnconditionally in the pass from 9 to 8 (this helps
balance the last point).
* Use half that value when not optimizing for size. That is, we allow only 4 extra
unconditional work normally, and 8 in -Os, and when -Oz then we allow any
extra amount.
Aside from the new testcases, some existing ones changed. They all appear to
change in a reasonable way, to me.
We should perhaps go even further than this, and not even run a division
unconditionally in -Os, but I wasn't sure it makes sense to go that far as
other benchmarks may be affected. For now, this makes the benchmark in
#5983 run at full speed in -O3 or -Os, and it remains slow in -Oz. The
modified version of the benchmark that only divides in the if (no other
operations) is still fast in -O3, but it become slow in -Os as we do turn that
if into a select (but again, I didn't want to go that far as to overfit on that one
benchmark).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace i31.new with ref.i31 in the printer, tests, and source code. Continue
parsing i31.new for the time being to allow a graceful transition. Also update
the JS API to reflect the new instruction name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When printing Binaryen IR, we previously generated names for unnamed heap types
based on their structure. This was useful for seeing the structure of simple
types at a glance without having to separately go look up their definitions, but
it also had two problems:
1. The same name could be generated for multiple types. The generated names did
not take into account rec group structure or finality, so types that differed
only in these properties would have the same name. Also, generated type names
were limited in length, so very large types that shared only some structure
could also end up with the same names. Using the same name for multiple types
produces incorrect and unparsable output.
2. The generated names were not useful beyond the most trivial examples. Even
with length limits, names for nontrivial types were extremely long and visually
noisy, which made reading disassembled real-world code more challenging.
Fix these problems by emitting simple indexed names for unnamed heap types
instead. This regresses readability for very simple examples, but the trade off
is worth it.
This change also reduces the number of type printing systems we have by one.
Previously we had the system in Print.cpp, but we had another, more general and
extensible system in wasm-type-printing.h and wasm-type.cpp as well. Remove the
old type printing system from Print.cpp and replace it with a much smaller use
of the new system. This requires significant refactoring of Print.cpp so that
PrintExpressionContents object now holds a reference to a parent
PrintSExpression object that holds the type name state.
This diff is very large because almost every test output changed slightly. To
minimize the diff and ease review, change the type printer in wasm-type.cpp to
behave the same as the old type printer in Print.cpp except for the differences
in name generation. These changes will be reverted in much smaller PRs in the
future to generally improve how types are printed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The upstream WasmGC spec has removed `data` and introduced `struct`. To make the
migration easier, we have been supporting `struct` as an `alias` for `data` and
`structref` as an alias for `dataref`.
Update the tests to prefer the `struct` aliases over `data` for test input to
make the future migration easier. Also update some tests that had stale comments
about ref.null types being updated and remove some tests for instructions like
br_on_data and ref.as_data that do not make sense without a `data` type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes Binaryen's default type system match the WasmGC spec.
Update the way type definitions without supertypes are printed to reduce the
output diff for MVP tests that do not involve WasmGC. Also port some
type-builder.cpp tests from test/example to test/gtest since they needed to be
rewritten to work with isorecursive type anyway.
A follow-on PR will remove equirecursive types completely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These types, `none`, `nofunc`, and `noextern` are uninhabited, so references to
them can only possibly be null. To simplify the IR and increase type precision,
introduce new invariants that all `ref.null` instructions must be typed with one
of these new bottom types and that `Literals` have a bottom type iff they
represent null values. These new invariants requires several additional changes.
First, it is now possible that the `ref` or `target` child of a `StructGet`,
`StructSet`, `ArrayGet`, `ArraySet`, or `CallRef` instruction has a bottom
reference type, so it is not possible to determine what heap type annotation to
emit in the binary or text formats. (The bottom types are not valid type
annotations since they do not have indices in the type section.)
To fix that problem, update the printer and binary emitter to emit unreachables
instead of the instruction with undetermined type annotation. This is a valid
transformation because the only possible value that could flow into those
instructions in that case is null, and all of those instructions trap on nulls.
That fix uncovered a latent bug in the binary parser in which new unreachables
within unreachable code were handled incorrectly. This bug was not previously
found by the fuzzer because we generally stop emitting code once we encounter an
instruction with type `unreachable`. Now, however, it is possible to emit an
`unreachable` for instructions that do not have type `unreachable` (but are
known to trap at runtime), so we will continue emitting code. See the new
test/lit/parse-double-unreachable.wast for details.
Update other miscellaneous code that creates `RefNull` expressions and null
`Literals` to maintain the new invariants as well.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Just like `extern` is no longer a subtype of `any` in the new GC type system,
`func` is no longer a subtype of `any`, either. Make that change in our type
system implementation and update tests and fuzzers accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previously the wat parser would turn this input:
(block
(nop)
)
into something like this:
(block $block17
(nop)
)
It just added a name all the time, in case the block is referred to by an index
later even though it doesn't have a name.
This PR makes us rountrip more precisely by not adding such names: if there
was no name before, and there is no break by index, then do not add a name.
In addition, this will be useful for non-nullable locals since whether a block has
a name or not matters there. Like #4912, this makes us more regular in our
usage of block names.
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes Binaryen match LLVM on a real-world case, which is probably
the safest heuristic to use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
if (A) {
if (B) {
C
}
}
=>
if (A ? B : 0) {
C
}
when B has no side effects, and is fast enough to consider running
unconditionally. In that case, we replace an if with a select and a
zero, which is the same size, but should be faster and may be
further optimized.
As suggested in #4168
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The spec disallows that.
Fixes #3990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of only generating checks for functions, generate checks for all named top-level module items, such as types, tags, tables, and memories. Because module items can be in different orders in the input and the output but FileCheck checks must follow the order of the output, we need to be slightly clever about when we emit the checks. Consider these types in the input file:
```
(type $A (...))
(type $B (...))
```
If their order is reversed in the output file, then the checks for $B need to be emitted before the checks for $A, so the resulting module will look like this:
```
;; CHECK: (type $B (...))
;; CHECK: (type $A (...))
(type $A (...))
(type $B (...))
```
Rather than this, which looks nicer but would be incorrect:
```
;; CHECK: (type $A (...))
(type $A (...))
;; CHECK: (type $B (...))
(type $B (...))
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The existing restructuring code could turn a block+br_if into an if in
simple cases, but it had some TODOs that I noticed were helpful on
GC benchmarks.
One limitation was that we need to reorder the condition and the value,
(block
(br_if
(value)
(condition)
)
(...)
)
=>
(if
(condition)
(value)
(...)
)
The old code checked for side effects in the condition. But it is ok for it
to have side effects if they can be reordered with the value (for example,
if the value is a constant then it definitely does not care about side effects
in the condition).
The other missing TODO is to use a select when we can't use an if:
(block
(drop
(br_if
(value)
(condition)
)
)
(...)
)
=>
(select
(value)
(...)
(condition)
)
In this case we do not reorder the condition and the value, but we do
reorder the condition with the rest of the block.
|
|
This is a partial revert of #3669, which removed the old implementation of
Type::getLeastUpperBound that did not correctly handle recursive types. The new
implementation in this PR uses a TypeBuilder to construct LUBs and for recursive
types, it returns a temporary HeapType that has not yet been fully constructed
to break what would otherwise be infinite recursions.
|