diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lisp/emacs-lisp')
-rw-r--r-- | lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-run.el | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-specs.el | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el | 4 |
3 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-run.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-run.el index 5dfdd04c9c2..33a3f06d4e6 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-run.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/byte-run.el @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ In interpreted code, this is entirely equivalent to `progn'." ;; verbose t, nil byte-compile-verbose ;; optimize t, nil, source, byte byte-compile-optimize ;; warnings list of warnings byte-compile-warnings -;; Legal elements: (callargs redefine free-vars unresolved) +;; Valid elements: (callargs redefine free-vars unresolved) ;; file-format emacs18, emacs19 byte-compile-compatibility ;; ;; For example, this might appear at the top of a source file: diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-specs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-specs.el index d2d55204ef2..dc8ebef69d5 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-specs.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-specs.el @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ ;; Below is a complete spec for loop, in several parts that correspond ;; to the syntax given in CLtL2. The specs do more than specify where ;; the forms are; it also specifies, as much as Edebug allows, all the -;; syntactically legal loop clauses. The disadvantage of this +;; syntactically valid loop clauses. The disadvantage of this ;; completeness is rigidity, but the "for ... being" clause allows ;; arbitrary extensions of the form: [symbolp &rest &or symbolp form]. diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el index 24d3284f08f..1f883487ea7 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ expressions; a `progn' form will be returned enclosing these forms." (cond ((symbolp head) (cond - ((null head) nil) ; () is legal. + ((null head) nil) ; () is valid. ((eq head 'interactive-p) ;; Special case: replace (interactive-p) with variable (setq edebug-def-interactive 'check-it) @@ -2076,7 +2076,7 @@ expressions; a `progn' form will be returned enclosing these forms." ;; doesn't handle (a . ,b). The straightforward fix: ;; (backquote-form . [&or nil backquote-form]) ;; uses up too much stack space. - ;; Note that `(foo . ,@bar) is not legal, so we don't need to handle it. + ;; Note that `(foo . ,@bar) is not valid, so we don't need to handle it. (backquote-form [&rest [¬ ","] backquote-form] . [&or nil backquote-form]) ;; If you use dotted forms in backquotes, replace the previous line |